Possibility of using of osteopathic methods of correction in the therapy of symphysiopathy in pregnant women
https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2021-2-76-85
Abstract
A number of physiological changes occurring in a woman′s organism during pregnancy includes, among other things, structural and functional changes in the musculoskeletal system, manifested by softening of the ligaments, cartilage, synovial membranes of the pubic and sacroiliac joints, and as a result, there is some discrepancy pubic bones, which contributes to the safe passage of the fetus through the natural birth canal during childbirth. However, these changes can cross physiological boundaries, leading to excessive relaxation of the pelvic joints, the occurrence of pain and the risk of divergence of the pubic symphysis during pregnancy and childbirth. Despite a fairly clear description of this condition, until now there is no unified terminology for pathological changes in the pelvic bones during pregnancy. In the Russian literature the terms such as symphysitis, symphysiopathy, divergence and rupture of the pubic articulation are accepted, but the most foreign authors suggest the term «pubic articulation dysfunction» to be used. However this term also does not fully reflect the essence of the pathological process. Despite the sufficient knowledge of the problem, the management of patients with this nosology still remains a rather serious task for clinicians. The problems of the isolated using and mutual compatibility of various non-drug methods have not yet been sufficiently studied, and the use of drugs is limited by the presence of pregnancy. A case from practice is described, devoted to the isolated use (monotherapy) of osteopathic correction in a pregnant woman in order to prevent rupture of the pubic articulation.
About the Authors
E. N. Nenashkina
Institute of Osteopathy; Medical Clinics LLC «Mokhov Institute of Osteopathy»; Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elvira N. Nenashkina, senior lecturer; Assistant at the Institute of Osteopathy; obstetrician-gynecologist, doctor of ultrasonic diagnostics, osteopathic physician
eLibrary SPIN: 1083-6912
bld. 1A ul. Degtyarnaya, Saint-Petersburg, 191024
bld. 1A ul. Degtyarnaya, Saint-Petersburg, 191024
bld. 7/9 Universitetskaya nab., Saint-Petersburg, 199034
V. O. Belash
Institute of Osteopathy; Medical Clinics LLC «Mokhov Institute of Osteopathy»; Mechnikov North-West Medical State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir O. Belash, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at Osteopathy Department; lecturer; head physician
eLibrary SPIN: 2759-1560
Scopus Author ID: 25959884100
bld. 1A ul. Degtyarnaya, Saint-Petersburg, 191024
bld. 1A ul. Degtyarnaya, Saint-Petersburg, 191024
bld. 41 ul. Kirochnaya, Saint-Petersburg, 191015
References
1. Логутова Л. С., Чечнева М. А., Лысенко С. Н., Черкасова Н. Ю. Ультразвуковая диагностика состояния лонного сочленения у женщин. Рус. мед. журн. Мать и дитя. 2015; 23 (1): 42–45. [Logutova L. S., Chechneva M. A., Lysenko S. N., Cherkasova N. Yu. Ultrasound diagnostics of the pubic symphysis condition in women. Russ. med. J. Mother and child. 2015; 23 (1): 42–45 (in russ.)].
2. Kanakaris N. K., Roberts C. S., Giannoudis P. V. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an update. BMC Med. 2011; 9 (1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-15
3. Wu W. H., Meijer O. G., Uegaki K., Mens J. M. A., van Dieën J. H., Wuisman P. I. J. M., Östgaard H. C. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Europ. Spine J. 2004; 13 (7): 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0615-y
4. Черкасова Н. Ю. Прогнозирование риска материнского травматизма у беременных с патологией лонного симфиза: Автореф. дис. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2016. [Cherkasova N. Yu. Predicting the risk of maternal injury in pregnant women with symphysis pubis pathology: Abstract Dis. Cand. Sci. (Med.). M.; 2016 (in russ.)].
5. Акушерство: Национальное рук. / Под ред. Э. К. Айламазяна, В. И. Кулакова, В. Е. Радзинского, Г. М. Савельевой. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2011; 1200 с. [Obstetrics: National guideline / Eds. E. K. Ailamazyan, V. I. Kulakov, V. E. Radzinsky, G. M. Savelyeva. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2011; 1200 p. (in russ.)].
6. Савельева Г. М., Шалина Р. И., Сичинава Л. Г., Панина О. Б., Курцер М. А. Акушерство: Учеб. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2015; 656 с. [Savelyeva G. M., Shalina R. I., Sichinava L. G., Panina O. B., Kurtser M. A. Obstetrics: Textbook. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2015; 656 p. (in russ.)].
7. Петрушин А. Л., Прялухина А. В. Расхождение лонного сочленения при беременности и родах (обзор литературы). Травматол. и ортопед. России. 2018; 24 (3): 145–156. [Petrushin A. L., Pryaluchina A. V. Pubic symphysis diastasis in pregnancy and delivery (review). Traumatol. Orthoped. Russia. 2018; 24 (3): 145–156 (in russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-3-145-156
8. Chawla J. J., Arora D., Sandhu N., Jain M., Kumari A. Pubis symphysis diastasis: a case series and literature review. Oman Med. J. 2017; 32 (6): 510–514. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2017.97
9. Korashadi L., Petscavage J. M., Richardson M. L. Postparum symphysis pubis diastasis. Radiol. Case Reports. 2011; 6 (3): 542. https://doi.org/10.2484/rcr.v6i3.542
10. Jain N., Sternberg L. B. Symphyseal separation. Obstet. Gynec. 2005; 105 (5): 1229–1232. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000149744.82912.ea
11. Svelato A., Ragusa A., Perino A., Meroni M. G. Is x-ray compulsory in pubic symphysis diastasis diagnosis? Acta Obstet. Gynec. Scand. 2014; 93 (2): 219. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12275
12. Серов В. Н., Ананьев Е. В. Оценка степени тяжести дисфункции лонного сочленения и выбор метода родоразрешения. Рос. вестн. акушера-гинеколога. 2011; 11 (3): 45–48. [Serov V. N., Anan′ev E. V. The evaluation of the degree of symphysis pubis dysfunction and the choice of delivery method. Russ. Bull. Obstet.-Gynec. 2011; 11 (3): 45–48 (in russ.)].
13. Urraca-Gesto M. A., Plaza-Manzano G., Ferragut-Garcias A., Pecos-Martin D., Gallego-Izquierdo T., Romero Franco N. Diastasis of symphysis pubis and labor: Systematic review. J. Rehab. Res. Develop. 2015; 52 (6): 629–640. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2014.12.0302
14. Пьяных М. С., Лебедев Д. С. Остеопатическая коррекция дисфункций таза у беременных в комплексной терапии фетоплацентарной недостаточности. Российский остеопатический журнал. 2013; 1–2 (20–21): 98–104. [Pyanykh M. S., Lebedev D. S. Osteopathic Correction of Pelvic Dysfunctions in Pregnant Women in Complex Therapy of Fetoplacental Insuffi ciency. Russian Osteopathic Journal. 2013; 1–2 (20–21): 98–104 (in russ.)].
15. Мохов Д. Е., Трегубова Е. С., Потехина Ю. П. Остеопатия и ее восстановительный потенциал. СПб.: Невский ракурс; 2020; 200 с. [Mokhov D. E., Tregubova E. S., Potekhina Yu. P. Osteopathy and its regenerative potential. St. Petersburg: Nevskij rakurs; 2020; 200 p. (in russ.)].
16. Мохов Д. Е., Белаш В. О., Кузьмина Ю. О., Лебедев Д. С., Мирошниченко Д. Б., Трегубова Е. С., Ширяева Е. Е., Юшманов И. Г. Остеопатическая диагностика соматических дисфункций: Клинические рекомендации. СПб.: Невский ракурс; 2015; 90 с. [Mokhov D. E., Belash V. O., Kuzmina Ju. O., Lebedev D. S., Miroshnichenko D. B., Tregubova E. S., Shirjaeva E. E., Yushmanov I. G. Osteopathic Diagnosis of Somatic Dysfunctions: Clinical Recommendations. St. Petersburg: Nevskij rakurs; 2015; 90 p. (in russ.)].
17. Мохов Д. Е., Белаш В. О. Методология клинического остеопатического обследования: Учеб. пособие. СПб.: Изд-во СЗГМУ им. И. И. Мечникова; 2019; 80 с. [Mokhov D. E., Belash V. O. Methodology of clinical osteopathic examination: Study guide. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo SZGMU im. I. I. Mechnikova; 2019; 80 p. (in russ.)].
18. Scott J., Huskisson E. C. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976; 2 (2): 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(76)90113-5
19. Teodorczyk-Injeyan J. A., Injeyan H. S., Ruegg R. Spinal manipulative therapy reduces infl ammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects. J. Manipulat. Physiol. Ther. 2006; 29 (1): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.10.002
20. Потехина Ю. П., Трегубова Е. С., Мохов Д. Е. Феномен соматической дисфункции и механизмы действия остеопатического лечения. Мед. вестн. Северного Кавказа. 2020; 15 (1): 145–152. [Potekhina Yu. P., Tregubova E. S., Mokhov D. E. The phenomenon of somatic dysfunction and the mechanisms of osteopathic treatment. Med. News North Caucasus. 2020; 15 (1): 145–152 (in russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2020.15036
Review
For citations:
Nenashkina E.N., Belash V.O. Possibility of using of osteopathic methods of correction in the therapy of symphysiopathy in pregnant women. Russian Osteopathic Journal. 2021;(2):76-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2021-2-76-85
Views:
669
Email this article 