Preview

Russian Osteopathic Journal

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Combined rehabilitation of patients after acute cerebrovascular accident in the early recovery period: the role of osteopathic correction

https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2025-3-74-81

Abstract

Introduction. Acute cerebrovascular accident (ACA) circulatory disorders are the cause of persistent motor disorders in the form of impaired static-dynamic functions and psychoemotional disorders, which significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Disability due to stroke ranks 1st among all causes of disability in Russia and is an important medical and social problem requiring a comprehensive rehabilitation approach. The biofeedback method (biofeedback therapy), as one of the modern methods of hardware rehabilitation, demonstrates its effectiveness in research on restoring lost functions in patients who have undergone ACA. One of the methods of neurorehabilitation of patients with ACA is osteopathic correction (structural, visceral, cranial), which improves the regulation of static and dynamic postural balance.
The aim of the study: to study the effectiveness of osteopathic correction on the formation of a motor stereotype in the rehabilitation of patients with ACA in the early recovery period.
Materials and methods. The study was conducted at the Biomechanics Laboratory of the Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine from November 2019 to March 2021. A randomized controlled prospective study involved 155 patients with stroke aged 40 to 75 years who underwent rehabilitation for 10 days in hospital. The patients were divided into two groups by simple randomization. Patients of both groups received standard preventive therapy for stroke (antiplatelet, lipidlowering, hypotensive therapy), as well as 10 sessions of physical therapy and Bio-feedback therapy. The main group underwent osteopathic correction after the first and fifth sessions of Bio-feedback therapy, while the control group underwent standard treatment without osteopathic correction. All patients underwent stabilometry, osteopathic examination, and a 10-meter walking time.
Results. The inclusion of osteopathic correction in the course of biofeedback therapy in patients in the early recovery period improves the function of postural control according to stabilometry (p<0,05) compared with standard treatment. Somatic dysfunctions at the global and regional levels were revealed in both groups. Among global-level somatic dysfunctions, rhythmogenic cranial impairment was identifi ed, which was also the dominant somatic dysfunctions in these patients.
Conclusion. Osteopathic correction in patients with ACA in the early recovery period improves the static-dynamic characteristics of the motor stereotype.

About the Authors

T. G. Makichyan
Medical clinic «Osteopolyclinic»
Russian Federation

Tigran G. Makichyan, chief physician, osteopathic physician

bld. 7 k. 4 ul. Bolshaya Tatarskaya, Moscow, Russia 115184 



A. V. Rylsky
Institute of Osteopathy
Russian Federation

Aleksey V. Rylskiy, osteopathic physician, lecturer

Scopus Author ID: 35773789600

bld. 1 lit. A ul. Degtyarnaya, Saint-Petersburg, Russia 191024 



D. I. Melkosyants
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Russian Federation

Denis I. Melkosyants, student

bld. 2 k. 4 ul. Bolshaya Pirogovskaya, Moscow, Russia 119435 



References

1. Amirkhanova L. Sh. Quality of life and cognitive status of patients in the recovery period after a stroke. Perm med. J. 2013; 30 (3): 82–86 (in russ.).

2. Feigin V. L., Brainin M., Norrving B. et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int. J. Stroke. 2022; 17 (1): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211065917

3. Rylskiy A. V. Psychological characteristics of stroke patients. Human Capital. 2019; 11 (131): 195–200 (in russ.).

4. Harrison M., Ryan T., Gardiner C., Jones A. Psychological and emotional needs, assessment, and support poststroke: A multi-perspective qualitative study. Top Stroke Rehab. 2017; 24 (2): 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2016.1196908

5. Rudakova A. V., Chebotareva U. V., Shayakhmetova G. R. Possibilities of biofeedback therapy in the comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with consequences of acute ischemic cerebral circulation disorder // In: Mechnikov Readings–2020: Proceedings of the All-Russ. Sci. Pract. Conference with Int. Participat. (vol. II). St. Petersburg: NWSMU named after I. I. Mechnikov; 2020: 262–263 (in russ.).

6. Miryutova N. F., Tsekhmeystruk E. A., Minchenko N. N. Biofeedback training in the rehabilitation of post-stroke patients. Kurort. med. 2023; 4: 73–79. https://doi.org/10.51871/2304-0343_2023_4_73 (in russ.)

7. Bonini-Rocha A. C., De Andrade A. L. S., Santos Pereira R. D. et al. Biofeedback interventions for short term upper limb function following stroke: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Hand Ther. 2023; 36 (3): 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2022.05.001

8. Kozlova N. V., Cexmejstruk E. A., Atamanova I. V. et al. An impact of biofeedback training on the effectiveness of cognitive training in stroke patients. Lurian J. 2020; 1 (1): 129–139. https://doi.org/10.15826/Lurian.2020.1.1.9

9. Pinheiro C., Figueiredo J., Cerqueira J., Santos C. P. Robotic biofeedback for post-stroke gait rehabilitation: A scoping review. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22 (19): 7197. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197197

10. Mokhov D. E., Belash V. O., Aptekar I. A., Nenashkina E. N., Potekhina Yu. P., Tregubova E. S., Belyaev A. F. Somatic dysfunction: Clinical guidelines 2023. Russ. Osteopath. J. 2023; 2: 8–90. https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2023-2-8-90 (in russ.).

11. Belash V. O., Gritsay E. O., Musina T. S. Application of osteopathic correction in the comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with acute cerebrovascular accident. Russ. Osteopath. J. 2022; 2: 27–39. https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2022-2-27-39 (in russ.).

12. Potekhina Yu. P., Tregubova E. S., Mokhov D. E. Effects of osteopathic correction and the possibility of their study. Russ. Osteopath. J. 2022; 4: 8–29. https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2022-4-8-29 (in russ.).

13. Kozlova N. S., Amelin A. V. The effectiveness of additional treatment methods for post-stroke periarthropathy of the shoulder joint. Russ. Osteopath. J. 2019; 1–2: 34–42. https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2019-1-2-34-42 (in russ.).

14. Kurnikova A. A., Potekhina Yu. P., Filatov A. A. et al. The role of the musculoskeletal system in maintaining postural balance (literature review). Russ. Osteopath. J. 2019; 3–4: 135–149. https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2019-3-4-135-149 (in russ.).

15. Mokhov D. E., Mogelnitsky A. S., Potekhina Yu. P. Prevention of postural and motor disorders: Textbook. M.: GEOTARMedia; 2023: 208 p. (in russ.).

16. Mokhov D. E. Basic theoretical aspects of postural system functioning. Manual Ther. 2009; 1 (33): 76–82 (in russ.).

17. Kostenko E. V., Petrova L. V., Rylskiy A. V. et al. Features of the correction of statolococomotor disorders in stroke patients with emotional and cognitive disorders: а randomized clinical open controlled study. Farmateka. 2020; 27 (3): 78–88. https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2020.3.78-88 (in russ.).

18. Watson M. J. Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people. Physiotherapy. 2002; 88 (7): 386–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61264-3


Review

For citations:


Makichyan T.G., Rylsky A.V., Melkosyants D.I. Combined rehabilitation of patients after acute cerebrovascular accident in the early recovery period: the role of osteopathic correction. Russian Osteopathic Journal. 2025;(3):74-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2025-3-74-81

Views: 25


ISSN 2220-0975 (Print)
ISSN 2949-3064 (Online)