Research in the field of osteopathy: interest, methodology and perspectives
https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2018-3-4-135-139
Abstract
There is a specifi c interest to the development of research in the osteopathic fi eld: fi rst in order to understand better its effects, then to continue to optimize its practice. To objectivise and quantify the effects of osteopathy would not only legitimate its practice but would also permit progression for the practitioners. These practitioners usually have a somewhat unclear notion of what research is. Firstly this article plans to describe the different types of studies of interest for the osteopathic fi eld, secondly to give an example of scientifi c process, including a step-by-step guide to the osteopath in devising his/her refl exion and building his/her project.
About the Authors
Alice Véron
Departement Recherche, Centre International d′Osteopathie (CIDO)
France
France
Lyon
Saint-Etienne
Martin Garet
Departement Recherche, Centre International d′Osteopathie (CIDO); Service de Physiologie Clinique et de l′Exercice, Laboratoire SNA EPIS
France
Saint-Etienne
France
Saint-Etienne
Frédérique Bertholon
Departement Recherche, Centre International d′Osteopathie (CIDO); Service de Physiologie Clinique et de l′Exercice, Laboratoire SNA EPIS
France
Saint-Etienne
France
Saint-Etienne
Patrick Féval
Departement Recherche, Centre International d′Osteopathie (CIDO)
France
Saint-Etienne
France
Saint-Etienne
References
1. Beal M. C. Research Directions from 1940–1988. The AAO Journal. 2000; 21–28.
2. Daniel W. B. Publishing your medical research paper. Baltimore: William & Wilkins; 1998. 298 p.
3. Fortin F., Taggart E., Rerouac S., Normand S. Introduction à la recherche. Montréal: Décarie, 1988. 417 p.
4. Jeannin J. P. Les étapes d′une recherche en sciences sociales. http://www.sosreseaux.com/sos_etudiants_etapes_recherche.php. Consulté le 03/02/2011.
5. Mace G., Pétry F. Guide d′élaboration d′un projet de recherche. Bruxelles: De Boeck université (2e ed.); 2000. 116 p.
6. Matillon Y., Durieux P. L′évaluation médicale du concept à la pratique. Paris: Flammarion (2e ed.); 2000. 180 p.
7. R-DO.org : Portail de la Recherche et de la Formation en Ostéopathie. http://www.r-do.org/. Consulté le 03/02/2011.
8. Vaucher Paul. Comment dois-je m′y prendre pour savoir ce que je vais faire comme recherche? Site de l′ostéopathie: http://www.osteopathie-france.net/essai/lareconnaissance/recherche/1273-depart. Consulté le 03/02/2011.
9. Vaucher Paul. Comment dois-je rédiger mon protocole? Site offi ciel de l′USPO: http://michel.hourdeaux.pagespersoorange.fr/uspo/publications/vaucher/protocolevaucher.shtml. Consulté le 03/02/2011.
10. Weinberg A. La fausse querelle des méthodes. Sciences Humaines. 1994; 35: 14–21.
Review
For citations:
Véron A., Garet M., Bertholon F., Féval P. Research in the field of osteopathy: interest, methodology and perspectives. Russian Osteopathic Journal. 2018;(3-4):135-139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2018-3-4-135-139
Views:
677
Email this article 