Preview

Russian Osteopathic Journal

Advanced search

What Place Should Osteopathy Take in the System of Medical Services in France?

https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2017-3-4-76-82

Abstract

In order for osteopathy to be included in the system of medical services in France, it is necessary to assess the effectiveness and its role in public healthcare and preventive care. The article suggests studying the research methods adapted to the applied research of osteopathy, with the integration of human and subjective measurement of this new branch of medicine. It is necessary to do research on separating the technical part of the osteopathic session from the relational part using the tools of analysis of evidence-based medicine in order to offer a rational perception-focused practice. Moreover, the therapeutic status of osteopathy should be discussed.It is important to create epistemology of osteopathy, to defi ne dysfunction, to clarify techniques, their purposes and effectiveness, to evaluate a treatment session from the point of view of psychology, anthropology, sociology, and philosophy, in addition to clinical research.

About the Author

C. . Clouzeau
ISOstéo School of Osteopathy
Russian Federation


References

1. Dabi F., Merceron A. La notoriété et l′image des osteopathes. Available from: URL: https://osteofrance.com/perch/resources/publications/sondageifop2016.pdf

2. Graz B., Charpak N. Les médecines complémentaires. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, 2012; 141 p.

3. Setbon M. La qualité des soins, nouveau paradigme de l′action collective? Sociologie du Travail 2000; 42 (1): 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0296(00)00107-2.

4. Donoso Fr., Donoso M. Evolutions de la médecine, révolutions de l′ostéopathie. Favre, 2016; 192 p.

5. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report %20Files/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm/Quality %20Chasm %202001 %20 %20report %20brief.pdf. Updated 2001. Accessed 2 Apr 2014.

6. Contandriopoulos A-P., Champagne F., Denis J.-L., Avargues M. C. Evaluation in the health sector: concepts and methods. Revue d′épidémiologie et de santé publique 2001; 48: 517-539.

7. Chagnon M., Lange-Sondack P., Arlot-Tovel D. Méthode d′appréciation de la qualité des soins infi rmiers (M.A.Q.S.I.). Third International Conference on System Science in Health Care 1984: 1046-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69939-9_241.

8. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1966; 44 (3): 166-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/3348969.

9. Kelley E., Hurst J. Health care quality indicators project: conceptual framework paper. OECD Health Working Papers No.23. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/36262363.pdf (2006).

10. Roemer M. I., Montoya-Aguilar C. Quality assessment and assurance in primary health care. Geneva, World Health Organization 1988; 105: 82 p.


Review

For citations:


Clouzeau C. What Place Should Osteopathy Take in the System of Medical Services in France? Russian Osteopathic Journal. 2017;(3-4):76-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32885/2220-0975-2017-3-4-76-82

Views: 449


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2220-0975 (Print)
ISSN 2949-3064 (Online)